Repetition does not an argument make

So I was reading a book recently (big shocker there, I know) and the author seemed to think that if he repeated the same thing over and over (and over and over and over) again he would convince me that he spoke the truth.

I'm sorry, but a faulty argument repeated many times is still an faulty argument; repeating it simply makes it a SERIOUSLY ANNOYING faulty argument.  You just want to swat it like a nasty hovering buzzing bee.